<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>the truth shall set you free Comments</title>
	<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: доставка пиццы москва</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2006/01/07/via-crucis-popular-posts/#comment-136</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2006/01/07/via-crucis-popular-posts/#comment-136</guid>
					<description>my frient told me 'bout this yesterdaY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>my frient told me &#8217;bout this yesterdaY
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred A. Fairbanks</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/25/durango-bill-vs-himself/#comment-135</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/25/durango-bill-vs-himself/#comment-135</guid>
					<description>Noah's Flood was an oral tradition for eons of time before it finally got set as a written one. At the time of that flood, the known world of a given clan or group of people was exceedingly small. A clan never knew anyone or anything on the other side of a mountain range. Geologically and theologically the flood occurred but in a very small area of the earths surface, comprising the &quot;whole world&quot; of those who witnessed it and started the tradition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Noah&#8217;s Flood was an oral tradition for eons of time before it finally got set as a written one. At the time of that flood, the known world of a given clan or group of people was exceedingly small. A clan never knew anyone or anything on the other side of a mountain range. Geologically and theologically the flood occurred but in a very small area of the earths surface, comprising the &#8220;whole world&#8221; of those who witnessed it and started the tradition.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mozilla firefox 2.0 download</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/23/scientist-quotes/#comment-134</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/23/scientist-quotes/#comment-134</guid>
					<description>In which country do you live? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In which country do you live? <img src='http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: johnnyStampeed</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/23/scientist-quotes/#comment-133</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/23/scientist-quotes/#comment-133</guid>
					<description>Mr. Ortega. What do you base your idea that life exists solely on Earth? A certain Book I suppose. You ignore the leaked evidence (testimony, photography and video) of the possibility of ET life. My ancestors created me as did theirs before them. I am a product of subconscious design. Whether or not it was intelligent remains to be seen but, so far so good. As long as a variation of my genetics exists for an extended amount of time I will assume I was designed intelligently enough to withstand the relative environment. Now, as for what set things all in motion? That is a question that science cannot presently answer. The only thing we can assume is that there is an answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mr. Ortega. What do you base your idea that life exists solely on Earth? A certain Book I suppose. You ignore the leaked evidence (testimony, photography and video) of the possibility of ET life. My ancestors created me as did theirs before them. I am a product of subconscious design. Whether or not it was intelligent remains to be seen but, so far so good. As long as a variation of my genetics exists for an extended amount of time I will assume I was designed intelligently enough to withstand the relative environment. Now, as for what set things all in motion? That is a question that science cannot presently answer. The only thing we can assume is that there is an answer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Annie</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/07/19/the-big-bang-blind-faith/#comment-132</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:15:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/07/19/the-big-bang-blind-faith/#comment-132</guid>
					<description>Well, who created the &quot;big bang&quot;? Anyone who questions God just needs to read the Bible. We did come with instructions. It's in plain English!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, who created the &#8220;big bang&#8221;? Anyone who questions God just needs to read the Bible. We did come with instructions. It&#8217;s in plain English!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: elliott</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/23/scientist-quotes/#comment-131</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:45:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/23/scientist-quotes/#comment-131</guid>
					<description>&quot;we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes&quot; (Richard Lewontin). He makes a great point. In the same way that many religious people are quick to judge any idea that seems contrary to their belief system, so to are most scientists that were &quot;brought up&quot; in a materialisic learning environment.  EVERYONE needs to open their minds and not excuse valid scientific observation/deduction just because it threatens their established worldview. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes&#8221; (Richard Lewontin). He makes a great point. In the same way that many religious people are quick to judge any idea that seems contrary to their belief system, so to are most scientists that were &#8220;brought up&#8221; in a materialisic learning environment.  EVERYONE needs to open their minds and not excuse valid scientific observation/deduction just because it threatens their established worldview.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Cage</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/10/theology-vs-the-bible/#comment-119</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:36:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/10/10/theology-vs-the-bible/#comment-119</guid>
					<description>You are right on in your comments here. I was listening to Christian radio this a.m. and this intellectual theologian was teaching on the history of Christianity concerning heretical beliefs. He claims that a person must accept and believe certain things about the Trinity, which have been formulated in a system. And a Christian would have to be a PhD to understand what he was talking about. He spoke of all the various &quot;heresies&quot; concerning this subject.  I say this is one reason the Christian Church, the Body of Christ, is so divided, which division is heresy, not one's intellectual understanding of these various subjects.
What ever happened to simple faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord, His work on the Cross, His rending of the veil in our hearts, so that we may be born again and enter into the Kingdom of God? What ever happened to the fact that a little child can be born again, who is utterly incapable of understanding thelogy as such?
We do not need a system. We need Christ. And the Bible gives us all the instruction we need to know and follow Him as we should. We do not worship the Bible; we worship God and we approach Him in Christ. His Holy Spirit takes up residence in us and will lead us into all truth -- lining up with the New Testament, of course.
I do not have to believe anyone's concepts of theology, including the Trinity, at all. All I need to know of the Holy Spirit is revealed by Jesus in John 14, 15, 16 and 17. I can believe that the Holy Spirit is Christ's own Spirit, because that is what Jesus (and Paul) say! If you understand it a little differently, but nevertheless have the Spirit, you are my brother in Christ! All I need to know of the Father is all that Jesus, the Apostle Paul, and others in the NT tell us.  I do not even need the original Greek, if I have a spirit that has been made alive by God. There is nothing wrong, and in fact it is good, to study the original Greek, but we must still let God reveal the true meaning to us, not man.
The basic point is this: intellectual knowledge is nothing in Christianity unless we come to know God personally in an experiential way through Jesus Christ and the indwelling Spirit of God. And no one can take that personal experience away from us, because it is only God Who can and does impart it to us. People who say you must come under their systems are, in effect, defying God, because what are they going to answer when you tell them you are born again and Christ indwells you, places you in His Body and is Himself teaching you? Are they going to answer, &quot;No; that is not enough! You must believe Calvin, too!&quot; I say, nay, all of these great leaders -- Calvin, Luther, Wesley -- as great as they were and as greatly as God may have used them, are not God! God is ultimately a Christian's teacher, and that is what matters in the end.
Thank you for writing this. God bless you.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You are right on in your comments here. I was listening to Christian radio this a.m. and this intellectual theologian was teaching on the history of Christianity concerning heretical beliefs. He claims that a person must accept and believe certain things about the Trinity, which have been formulated in a system. And a Christian would have to be a PhD to understand what he was talking about. He spoke of all the various &#8220;heresies&#8221; concerning this subject.  I say this is one reason the Christian Church, the Body of Christ, is so divided, which division is heresy, not one&#8217;s intellectual understanding of these various subjects.<br />
What ever happened to simple faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord, His work on the Cross, His rending of the veil in our hearts, so that we may be born again and enter into the Kingdom of God? What ever happened to the fact that a little child can be born again, who is utterly incapable of understanding thelogy as such?<br />
We do not need a system. We need Christ. And the Bible gives us all the instruction we need to know and follow Him as we should. We do not worship the Bible; we worship God and we approach Him in Christ. His Holy Spirit takes up residence in us and will lead us into all truth &#8212; lining up with the New Testament, of course.<br />
I do not have to believe anyone&#8217;s concepts of theology, including the Trinity, at all. All I need to know of the Holy Spirit is revealed by Jesus in John 14, 15, 16 and 17. I can believe that the Holy Spirit is Christ&#8217;s own Spirit, because that is what Jesus (and Paul) say! If you understand it a little differently, but nevertheless have the Spirit, you are my brother in Christ! All I need to know of the Father is all that Jesus, the Apostle Paul, and others in the NT tell us.  I do not even need the original Greek, if I have a spirit that has been made alive by God. There is nothing wrong, and in fact it is good, to study the original Greek, but we must still let God reveal the true meaning to us, not man.<br />
The basic point is this: intellectual knowledge is nothing in Christianity unless we come to know God personally in an experiential way through Jesus Christ and the indwelling Spirit of God. And no one can take that personal experience away from us, because it is only God Who can and does impart it to us. People who say you must come under their systems are, in effect, defying God, because what are they going to answer when you tell them you are born again and Christ indwells you, places you in His Body and is Himself teaching you? Are they going to answer, &#8220;No; that is not enough! You must believe Calvin, too!&#8221; I say, nay, all of these great leaders &#8212; Calvin, Luther, Wesley &#8212; as great as they were and as greatly as God may have used them, are not God! God is ultimately a Christian&#8217;s teacher, and that is what matters in the end.<br />
Thank you for writing this. God bless you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christina</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/abortion-access-and-sex/#comment-113</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:09:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/abortion-access-and-sex/#comment-113</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;women need to be able to make responsible choices. &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, such as abstaining from sex when they aren't prepared to parent. Such as nurturing the children they do create.

Abortion is NOT a responsible decision. It's killing your own child to avoid responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>women need to be able to make responsible choices. </i></p>
	<p>Yes, such as abstaining from sex when they aren&#8217;t prepared to parent. Such as nurturing the children they do create.</p>
	<p>Abortion is NOT a responsible decision. It&#8217;s killing your own child to avoid responsibility.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christina</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/abortion-access-and-sex/#comment-112</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:07:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/abortion-access-and-sex/#comment-112</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;The creation of a “black market” for abortions, which in turn “increases the risk of a botched procedure”, will just increase the number of innocent young women injured &amp;amp;/or killed by dodgy practitioners. &lt;/i&gt;

Will it? If far fewer girls are getting pregnant, then fewer will be resorting to abortions. And the same batch of quacks will be doing the abortions, legal or not. Taking away the threat of prison for maiming or killing the girl isn't going to make the abortionist any more careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>The creation of a “black market” for abortions, which in turn “increases the risk of a botched procedure”, will just increase the number of innocent young women injured &amp;/or killed by dodgy practitioners. </i></p>
	<p>Will it? If far fewer girls are getting pregnant, then fewer will be resorting to abortions. And the same batch of quacks will be doing the abortions, legal or not. Taking away the threat of prison for maiming or killing the girl isn&#8217;t going to make the abortionist any more careful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christina</title>
		<link>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/abortion-access-and-sex/#comment-110</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:03:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://viacrucis.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/abortion-access-and-sex/#comment-110</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;We must leave the choice of what women should do with their own bodies up to each individual woman, even if that choice sadly includes abortion. &lt;/i&gt;

But abortion is something a woman (or girl) does to somebody else's body as well as her own. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>We must leave the choice of what women should do with their own bodies up to each individual woman, even if that choice sadly includes abortion. </i></p>
	<p>But abortion is something a woman (or girl) does to somebody else&#8217;s body as well as her own.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
